Accreditation and rankings
ABET Accreditation
Give outcome-based programs a structured way to map student outcomes, collect assessment evidence, document continuous improvement, and prepare international accreditation reviews.
Readiness story
ABET Accreditation needs evidence that daily systems can defend
Framework fit
student outcomes, continuous improvement, curriculum mapping, assessment evidence, and advisory inputs.
Evidence flow
ABET Accreditation preparation can pull from academics, exams, feedback, HR, library, placements, governance, and analytics instead of one-time file collection.
Review confidence
ESAAP helps outcome-based program teams track owners, gaps, exports, and improvement actions with a governed preparation cycle.
Who should attend
Bring the people who own ABET evidence and decisions
Outcome assessment team
Owns student outcomes, rubrics, direct and indirect assessment, advisory inputs, and improvement cycles.
Program faculty
Prepare course evidence, projects, labs, curriculum maps, advising records, and closure documentation.
Leadership reviewers
Check international readiness, curriculum alignment, student support, and continuous improvement evidence.
Assessment focus
Criteria and parameters ESAAP helps organize
Students
Student advising, progression, performance, transfer records, graduation checks, and support evidence.
Student Outcomes
Outcome definitions, direct and indirect assessments, rubrics, attainment, and improvement records.
Curriculum
Course sequencing, credits, lab/design components, outcome coverage, and academic planning evidence.
Continuous Improvement
Assessment cycles, review meetings, advisory inputs, corrective actions, and closure evidence.
Before the demo
Evidence to prepare for a practical ABET review
Current evidence map
Bring the current ABET criteria or indicator list, owner names, evidence folders, and missing items.
Source systems
List where ABET academic, exam, feedback, HR, library, placement, research, finance, and governance data currently lives.
Gap review
Identify ABET weak parameters, delayed departments, inconsistent records, and reports that take too long to prepare.
Export expectation
Clarify the ABET dashboards, attachments, summaries, and review packs the team needs before submission.
Evidence library
Records and dashboards to prepare continuously
Preparation cycle
From framework mapping to review-ready exports
Define
Set outcomes, assessment methods, rubrics, curriculum maps, and review owners.
Assess
Collect direct and indirect assessment data from courses, projects, labs, and surveys.
Improve
Document decisions, interventions, and evidence of closure across review cycles.
Prepare
Assemble program evidence packs for faculty, leadership, and evaluators.
Accreditation demo
Review ABET Accreditation readiness with your IQAC or ranking team
Share your current ABET evidence process, criteria owners, weak parameters, and reporting gaps so the ESAAP walkthrough can follow your actual review cycle.
Book ESAAP Demo